34,659 people
5,341 needed to reach 40,000

Add your voice

Right now there is a plan to ship up to one-third of the world’s high-level radioactive waste and bury it in South Australia.

This plan would impact Australians for the next 300,000 years.

It would enable aging nuclear reactors around the world – now under pressure to close because of their intractable waste problems – to stay open for another decade – more risk and more waste.

Let’s tell South Australian Premier Weatherill not to open Australia’s door to the world’s dirty and dangerous radioactive waste. We should not prop up this declining industry for a few more years and impose its waste on generations of our children to come.

Muckaty Tradiditonal Owners fought against a plan to dump waste on their country.

Muckaty Traditional Owners united against a plan to dump radioactive waste on their country, and won.

There’s an organised campaign for an international waste dump in Australia, an expensive “consultation” and social media campaign which presents the plan as if it’s a done deal. We need to counter this push.

The future for Australia – and the world’s – energy needs is renewable, not radioactive. Energy from the sun, wind, and waves is abundant and will never run out. It doesn’t pollute the air we breathe or the water we drink. Nuclear energy is dirty, dangerous, expensive and belongs in the past.

After seven decades of commercial nuclear power operations, not one nation has a final disposal site for high level waste and the sector is strewn with failed projects, timeline delays and massive cost overruns.

The global nuclear power sector is dying out due to public opposition, extreme costs and the rise of renewable energy.

Nuclear waste is like zombie waste – it remains undead.

Will you sign our petition to send a strong message so Premier Weatherill knows Australians don’t support South Australia storing radioactive waste from all around the world?

Together, we can ensure that South Australia’s future is bright, not glowing.

BREAKING NEWS: Citizens' jury rejects push for South Australian nuclear waste dump

Latest Supporters

Nuclear waste is a national policy area because of its strategic, environmental and public health implications. The SA government must listen to all Australians, including its consensus conference, and do nothing unilateral about nuclear waste.
Bob 2016-12-14 16:08:57 +1100
Val 2016-12-13 21:44:52 +1100
Don’t even consider it, keep it out there is no benefit. It almost amounts to treason.
Rohan 2016-12-13 14:12:04 +1100
Countries that produce high level radioactive waste can bury it in there own country. We do not want their nuclear waste or any of the risks associated to it.
Helen 2016-12-12 08:19:00 +1100
Don’t dump someone else’s waste in our country
Matthew 2016-12-10 10:58:09 +1100
Annolies 2016-12-09 12:24:11 +1100
Ilaria 2016-12-08 00:27:58 +1100
Cheyenne 2016-12-07 23:36:10 +1100
vicki 2016-12-07 23:23:22 +1100
Brittany 2016-12-07 22:56:24 +1100
Ron 2016-12-07 22:32:38 +1100
Helen 2016-12-07 22:01:13 +1100
Amber 2016-12-07 21:52:23 +1100
Nima 2016-12-07 21:40:11 +1100
Lets be smart and create more jobs and profit from being a leader in renewable energy – not from harbouring radioactive waste
Julie 2016-12-06 22:53:24 +1100
Such a beautiful couñtry and u can’t wait to ruin it for now and for future generations. Wake up to yourselves before it’s to late
Biffly 2016-12-06 13:13:36 +1100
Alexandra Whitehead
Alexandra 2016-12-06 10:52:54 +1100
Inara 2016-12-04 22:39:48 +1100
Ashleigh 2016-12-04 22:19:04 +1100
Mark 2016-12-04 07:21:25 +1100
Dw 2016-12-04 02:03:07 +1100
DIANA SANCHEZ
Diana 2016-12-03 22:46:13 +1100
Ollie 2016-12-03 09:20:44 +1100
Sophie 2016-12-03 04:41:51 +1100
Is Australia a dump? Only if you make it one.
Caroline 2016-12-03 02:31:28 +1100
Adam 2016-12-03 01:35:00 +1100
Hamish 2016-12-02 22:24:56 +1100
Please do not allow radioactive waste to be stored in South Australia. Do we really want to risk the possibility of an accident whilst the waste is in transit?
Do we really want to leave future generations to deal with & be at risk from the contamination of our soil & the dangers to their health?
Lisa 2016-12-02 19:24:28 +1100
Lisa Fankhauser
Lisa 2016-12-02 01:25:40 +1100
Tamara 2016-12-01 21:26:21 +1100