Australia must remain a nuclear-free country.
Nuclear energy and arms are not compatible with a clean future.
The Coalition's nuclear energy plan is light on detail but heavy with danger. It's a costly distraction from effective climate action that risks delaying – and even derailing – the sensible, considered and speedy transition to renewables that is already well underway and essential to protect the environment and safeguard our future.
To our representatives, we call on you to make Australia nuclear-free:
- End uranium mining and exports, and clean up all old uranium mines;
- Say no to nuclear power – it is high-risk, high-cost and a dangerous distraction from real climate solutions, like clean energy from the sun and wind;
- Take a strong stand against nuclear weapons – this includes signing and ratifying the UN nuclear weapons ban treaty;
- Manage radioactive waste transparently and responsibly.
The exaggerated claims being made by the latest round of nuclear promoters do not alter the evidence which clearly shows nuclear is the worst option for Australia. Promoting nuclear today will keep coal and gas burning for decades to come!
There are many reasons nuclear energy is not a viable alternative for Australia’s energy future:
-
It takes too long – on average, it takes about nine years to build a nuclear power station and another 10 years for planning and licensing. Effectively that means two decades between first idea and first power. These are the critical decades to immediately reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
-
It’s dirty and dangerous – Nuclear power stations pose significant community, environment and health risks. Apart from the radioactive waste they generate, nuclear power stations run on uranium which, like coal and gas, is not a renewable resource.
-
It’s far more expensive than renewable options – Modelling shows developing nuclear infrastructure is 5-10 times more expensive than solar and wind. And even if the technology was in place, it would also cost more to produce.
-
It needs a lot of water – Nuclear reactors use tonnes of water per second to cool the reactors to produce electricity. This is unlike wind and solar which require little or no ongoing water use.
-
We have no proven options for managing long-term radioactive waste – All reactors create waste, and this is a growing and unresolved global management issue. For decades successive governments have tried to impose low and intermediate level waste dumps and stores, predominantly on First Nations lands, across multiple sites in Australia.
We must leave the uranium in the ground to keep our communities and the nature we rely on safe.
Let's get it right and make Australia nuclear-free.
Header image: Sea lions gather on the beach on the Eyre Peninsula. At the top of the Peninsula is Kimba, where the government is proposing to put a national radioactive waste site despite unanimous opposition from Barngarla Traditional Owners
Latest Supporters
Pie in the sky politics! Meant to distract from their shortcomings of which there are plenty.
I agree with all the opinions given….we have wind..we have solar…we do not need Nuclear….and all the problems it can bring.
I want Australia to remain Nuclear free – an extremely high risk path and once in they can never be removed. Hasn’t Australian politicians learnt from the overseas disasters!!
Nuclear is far too expensive, uses too much water, will take too long to build, produces incredibly toxic waste that takes thousands of years to break down, has disastrous results to surrounding communities if anything goes wrong and cannot be turned off, causing solar panels on millions of homes to be wasted. We need to utilise wind and solar of which Australia has in abundance, with battery back up.
Australia is Blessed as the Navel of the Earth in terms of Resources and Energy.
We have so many more realistic Energy Options available to us that do not proliferate elsewhere on Earth.
We no longer need to continue relying on polluting fossil fuels; Nor fall for the lure and trap of nuclear energy with all its associated safety criteria and costs along with the expensive radiation containment.
We do not need nuclear!
So let us lead the world toward more viable options. Our one and only home planet needs us to champion alternative energies, because there is not really any other option.
Get Real!
Will Hallinan
There is no need for Australia to go nuclear we have a abundant supply of alternative and much cheaper options.
I want Australia to be nuclear free because it is too expensive and dangerous to people and the environment.
Everywhere in Hunter region of NSW that the Coalition want to put Nuclear in are prone to earthquakes. In fact a sporting facility right near the Erarring power station was forced to close due to risk from the coal power site if there was an earthquake. So if coal power is a risk, how could nuclear power not be. It would be a much more serious threat.
I want Australia to be nuclear free as we are in the unique position to be blessed by sun and wind. Nuclear waste is forever and our children and grandchildren will need to live with the consequences. I will not vote for any party proposing nuclear, for either power generation or defence purposes.
Nuclear reactors in the Southern Hemisphere carry the real and everlasting risk of nuclear radiation afflicting our entire hemisphere.
I want Australia to be nuclear free because:
a) The economics case is very dubious
b) it means we have to rely on dirty fossil fuels for much longer
c) Australians don’t want to have to deal with nuclear waste disposal if there are viable alternatives
d) it’s a sham funded by fossil fuel industry to waste time lining pockets, while the planet gets toasted.
I want Australia to be nuclear free because we cannot keep giving our descendants more problems to solve with disposal of toxic waste.
I want Australia to remain Nuclear free because of: associated risk as seen through nuclear catastrophies; lack of comprehensive waste and transportation management and costings; far higher likelihood of environmental damage than renewable energy options; huge water consumption and associated pollution.
Nuclear waste is something we don’t need to add to all the plastic n e-waste we are generating. Our environment is already toxic. The potential for environmental disaster is not worth the risk. We should be focusing on waste reduction n reducing unnecessary plastic production. Nuclear energy will only create the illusion of limitless energy at our disposal and increase the mass production sectors potential to continue to produce unnecessary consumer goods and plastic products.
The long term cost of nuclear energy to the health and wellbeing of our environment, animals and community far outweighs any benefits nuclear energy can provide. Nuclear is not sustainable