At least seven times more being spent to damage climate and nature than protect it
The budget contains at least seven times more spending on initiatives that damage nature and the climate than it allocates to climate and nature protection.
Australia’s national environment group has urged superannuation funds to push for board renewal at Woodside, as one of Australia’s largest super funds, HESTA, publicly challenges the gas giant’s board by nominating alternative directors.
“Woodside’s tin-eared determination to forge ahead with the enormous Scarborough gas project puts at risk species like the pygmy blue whale, Australia’s renewable export future and flies in the face of the science,” said the Australian Conservation Foundation’s corporate campaigner Jonathan Moylan.
“The best science – and economics – is clear: no new fossil fuel projects can be built if the world is to avoid the deadly effects of extreme heat and climate breakdown caused by climate pollution.
“HESTA’s intervention is consistent with the need to protect its members’ retirement years from the environmental and economic consequences of unchecked climate change.
“Stronger engagement is needed from super funds to align big polluters with the science and the lived reality of Australians.
“Woodside cannot survive the global energy transition without a more focused board, a new set of incentives and likely a different set of leaders.
“Woodside’s purported aspiration to net zero emissions is hollow and unsupported by the oil and gas giant’s actions, recent analysis by ACF has found.”
ACF’s analysis, What Woodside tried to hide, released a month ago, found:
ACF’s case asking the Federal Court to stop Woodside’s massive Scarborough gas project until its impact on the Great Barrier Reef is assessed will go to trial on 2 September 2024.