At least seven times more being spent to damage climate and nature than protect it
The budget contains at least seven times more spending on initiatives that damage nature and the climate than it allocates to climate and nature protection.
The National Climate Risk Assessment, two years in the making and released today, paints a picture of a profoundly altered Australia and its dire warnings demand an emergency response from the Albanese government, the Australian Conservation Foundation said.
The assessment analyses 11 priority risks under three scenarios: 1.5°C, 2°C and 3°C. (The Climate Action Tracker concludes current policies set the world on a path to 2.7°C of warming by the end of this century.)
Among other frightening forecasts, the 3°C by 2090 scenario warns:
“Children’s mental and physical health is being affected already and those impacts are getting worse,” said ACF’s Acting CEO Dr Paul Sinclair.
“This risk assessment must be a wake-up call for the Albanese government.
“An appropriate response to this alarm bell would be to rapidly phase out Australia’s coal and gas exports – because no matter where they are burned, they are harming Australians.
“Australia’s reformed nature laws must consider the damage global heating does to wildlife and places.
“To give Australians and our environment the best chance of holding global warming at the safest levels now possible, Australia should set a 2035 target of no less than 80%.”