Our featured actions

Download

The Future of Food: Are Australian food companies failing nature?

Woolworths and Coles: commit to stop bulldozing nature – protect and restore it instead

Petition

Deforestation action network signup

Food is integral to life. It’s not just something we need, it’s something we love. It’s part of who we are —our favourite meals, our family identity, our culture. It sustains us, but what sustains it? 

Healthy nature is vital for food production in Australia. From clean air and water to a liveable climate, our food system and nature are intrinsically linked. But Australia’s food system is failing nature.

Agriculture for food is one of the largest drivers of nature destruction in Australia, contributing to the collapse of 19 ecosystems and our position as a global deforestation hotspot. It accounts for approximately three quarters of freshwater withdrawals and contributes up to 17% of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions annually.

Put simply, the modern food system is a key contributor to the climate and nature crises. But it’s also a critical part of the solution. With a rapidly changing climate and growing global population to feed, it has never been more important to address the health of nature and the food system’s impact and reliance on it.

 

Key findings

The Future of Food Benchmark was born out of the urgency to address this impending and complex intersection of crises that affects us all. In an Australian first, the Australian Conservation Foundation assessed how 20 of Australia’s largest and most influential food companies are managing their impacts on nature and supporting the changes needed to halt and reverse nature destruction.

Company scores are out of 100, with higher scores being better than lower scores.

Check out the scores of six big food companies, including our supermarkets, below. To see the scores for all 20 companies, download the full report.

  • Coles

    28

    Brands: Coles Own Brand Products and Fresh Produce, CUB, Graze, Wellness Road

    What they’re doing well: Coles has demonstrated partnership with agricultural suppliers on target setting and delivery, and on helping some suppliers build sustainable capabilities.

    What they’re lagging on: Coles has not set a deforestation target, despite being one of Australia’s largest beef buyers. It also hasn’t evidenced assessment of nature risk in its agricultural value chain.

    Write to Coles

    • Risk assessment & disclosure4%
    • Nature targets9%
    • Strategy & action9%
    • Governance3%
    • Transparency3%
  • Woolworths

    26

    Brands: Woolworths Own Brand Products and Fresh Produce, Highgate, Thomas Dux, Plantitude

    What they’re doing well: Woolworths has demonstrated partnership with agricultural suppliers on target setting and delivery, and on helping some suppliers build sustainable capabilities.  

    What they’re lagging on: Woolworths has not evidenced any action towards tracing its agricultural value chain or assessing nature risks. 

    Write to Woolworths

    • Risk assessment & disclosure0%
    • Nature targets9%
    • Strategy & action6%
    • Governance8%
    • Transparency3%
  • Bega

    18

    Brands: Vegemite, Dairy Farmers, Pura, Farmers Union, Yoplait, Dare, Daily Juice Co, Berri

    What they’re doing well: Bega has evidenced a small amount of traceability to farm level. It has also demonstrated partnership with some agricultural suppliers by helping them build sustainable capabilities.

    What they’re lagging on: Bega has not set deforestation or water use targets for its value chain. It also has not evidenced nature accountability or expertise at board level.

    Write to Bega

    • Risk assessment & disclosure1%
    • Nature targets8%
    • Strategy & action6%
    • Governance2%
    • Transparency2%
  • Arnott's Group

    15

    Brands: Arnott’s, Campbell’s, 180 Degrees, Prego, V8, Messy Monkeys

    What they’re doing well: Arnott’s has demonstrated partnership with some of its agricultural suppliers by helping them build sustainable capabilities.

    What they’re lagging on: Arnott’s has not set any nature targets outside of emissions. It also has not evidenced nature accountability or expertise at board level. 

    Write to Arnott's

    • Risk assessment & disclosure1%
    • Nature targets5%
    • Strategy & action6%
    • Governance3%
    • Transparency1%
  • Aldi

    11

    Brands: Aldi Own Brand Products and Fresh Produce

    What they’re doing well: Aldi is the only supermarket which has set a best-practice deforestation and conversion target.  

    What they’re lagging on: Aldi has not evidenced any action towards tracing its agricultural value chain or assessing nature risks. It also hasn’t evidenced any board or executive level accountability for nature.

    Write to Aldi

    • Risk assessment & disclosure0%
    • Nature targets9%
    • Strategy & action3%
    • Governance0%
    • Transparency0%
  • Sanitarium

    0

    Brands: Weetbix, So Good, Up&Go, Vegie Delights, PB Nutrition

    What they’re doing well: Sanitarium has not evidenced any action on nature across any indicator.

    What they’re lagging on: It’s possible that Sanitarium has nature work happening behind the scenes, but without public reporting or engagement with NGOs like ACF, consumers have no way of knowing if, or how, the company is addressing nature issues.  

    Write to Sanitarium

    • Risk assessment & disclosure0%
    • Nature targets0%
    • Strategy & action0%
    • Governance0%
    • Transparency0%

Our food companies rely on nature. They must protect it.

We’ve assessed the policies and systems that major food companies have in place to protect nature. Explore our research:

What we measured Which brands were assessed How to read the scores Read the full report

What did the benchmark assess? 

The benchmark assessed thirty-seven indicators of sustainable practice across four sections. It also examined companies’ transparency as a standalone score against those indicators. 

Risk assessment & disclosure 

The Risk Assessment and Disclosure section assesses the company’s efforts to identify, prioritise, monitor, and disclose nature-related risks, opportunities, impacts and dependencies in their agricultural value chains.  

Nature targets 

The Nature Targets section assesses the adoption of targets and commitments in place to address nature-related impacts, and the company’s progress towards target reporting and delivery. Ten targets were assessed across five sub-sections including land, freshwater, biodiversity, climate, and food waste.  

Strategy & action 

The Strategy and Action section assesses the policies and actions the company has in place to address nature risks and impacts, and delivery on targets and commitments. 

Governance 

The Governance section evaluates the governance structures the company has in place to inform and execute its strategies to manage nature related risks and impacts, and to embed nature as a key consideration throughout the company. 

Transparency  

The Transparency score measures the public transparency of the company’s reporting against the preceding four sections by awarding additional points where the company had disclosed information publicly.  

We looked at 20 of Australia's most loved food companies

We've chosen six companies to focus on, but our research explored 20 food companies covering hundreds of brands. Do you see some of your favourites below? Download the full report to learn how each of these companies' policies on nature protection compare.

The 20 parent companies we assessed are: Aldi, Arnott's Group, Asahi, Bega, Coles, Costco, Domino's, Fonterra, George Weston Foods Limited, Hungry Jack's, Kraft Heinz, Lion, McDonald's, Nestle, Patties Foods, Sanitarium, Saputo Dairy Australia, Simplot, Unilever, and Woolworths.

How to read the scores

On this web page, the score in the circle is the company’s total weighted score as a percentage. The 5 scores underneath are the weighted scores for each section which add up to the top score. The total weighting and maximum % available for each section is as follows: 

Risk Assessment and Disclosure  

30% 

Nature Targets 

33% 

Strategy and Action 

16% 

Governance 

11% 

Transparency 

10% 

Please note that some section scores do not add up to the company’s total score due to rounding.