10,669 people
9,331 needed to reach 20,000

Add your name to the petition

Australia must remain a nuclear-free country.

Nuclear energy and arms are not compatible with a clean future.

It's a costly distraction from effective climate action that risks delaying – and even derailing – the sensible, considered and speedy transition to renewables that is already well underway and essential to protect the environment and safeguard our future.

To our elected representatives, we call on you to make Australia nuclear-free:

  • End uranium mining and exports, and clean up all old uranium mines;
  • Say no to nuclear power – it is high-risk, high-cost and a dangerous distraction from real climate solutions, like clean energy from the sun and wind;
  • Take a strong stand against nuclear weapons – this includes signing and ratifying the UN nuclear weapons ban treaty;
  • Manage radioactive waste transparently and responsibly.

The exaggerated claims being made by the latest round of nuclear promoters do not alter the evidence which clearly shows nuclear is the worst option for Australia.

There are many reasons nuclear energy is not a viable alternative for Australia’s energy future:

  • It takes too long – on average, it takes about nine years to build a nuclear power station and another 10 years for planning and licensing. Effectively that means two decades between first idea and first power. These are the critical decades to immediately reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
  • It’s dirty and dangerous – Nuclear power stations pose significant community, environment and health risks. Apart from the radioactive waste they generate, nuclear power stations run on uranium which, like coal and gas, is not a renewable resource.
  • It’s far more expensive than renewable options – Modelling shows developing nuclear infrastructure is 5-10 times more expensive than solar and wind. And even if the technology was in place, it would also cost more to produce.
  • It needs a lot of water – Nuclear reactors use tonnes of water per second to cool the reactors to produce electricity. This is unlike wind and solar which require little or no ongoing water use.
  • We have no proven options for managing long-term radioactive waste – All reactors create waste, and this is a growing and unresolved global management issue. For decades successive governments have tried to impose low and intermediate level waste dumps and stores, predominantly on First Nations lands, across multiple sites in Australia.

We must leave the uranium in the ground to keep our communities and the nature we rely on safe.

Let's get it right and make Australia nuclear-free.

Header image: Sea lions gather on the beach on the Eyre Peninsula. At the top of the Peninsula is Kimba, where the government is proposing to put a national radioactive waste site despite unanimous opposition from Barngarla Traditional Owners


Latest Supporters

Claire 2021-04-05 16:20:10 +1000
Brian 2021-03-30 18:46:37 +1100
Roslyn 2021-03-24 17:39:17 +1100
Mark 2021-03-23 10:47:29 +1100
Let’s all find peace within ourselves so our grand children will only ever know a clean and peaceful world.
Samantha 2021-03-21 09:00:10 +1100
Drew 2021-03-19 23:33:32 +1100
Anthea 2021-03-19 21:52:52 +1100
Jane 2021-03-19 17:56:06 +1100
Sign up and ratify ASAP Australia! C’mon Aussie! Do your bit for humanity and planet Earth.
Stephen 2021-03-15 12:23:29 +1100
Keep uranium in the ground where it belongs!!
Kelly 2021-03-15 02:11:25 +1100
Sherry 2021-03-12 18:03:41 +1100
Janet 2021-03-11 11:01:19 +1100
Ali 2021-03-09 20:58:14 +1100
Richard 2021-03-09 20:22:56 +1100
Arnold 2021-03-08 20:35:06 +1100
Margaret 2021-03-08 11:49:11 +1100
Rachel 2021-03-08 10:59:25 +1100
Nuclear is not a viable option for Australia:
It creates a high risk multi-generational legacy of radioactive waste.
It can’t compete on either capital or operational cost basis with wind and solar
Its global average build time is 9.4 years compared with Solar & Wind at typically less than 3 years.
It is inflexible and incompatible with Australia’s urgent need for responsive and flexible distributed energy resources
It uses massive quantities of scarce water
In summary nuclear energy would create far more problems than it could solve.
Malcolm 2021-03-08 00:14:41 +1100
I add my voice to the call for a nuclear free future
Rachel Loveday 2021-03-04 07:45:38 +1100
Sabine 2021-03-03 22:29:31 +1100
Jo 2021-03-03 22:23:41 +1100
Hasan 2021-03-02 12:32:51 +1100
Chris 2021-03-01 16:36:02 +1100
Better to explore alternative clean and safe energy options – including reducing energy requirements in the first instance.
Mario 2021-03-01 13:41:14 +1100
Bruce 2021-02-28 00:53:51 +1100
I’ll support nuclear energy when we don’t need to bury the waste for thousands of years, and when an incident doesn’t require us to abandon the area for hundreds of years. Until then… no to nuclear
Glen 2021-02-27 20:23:47 +1100
Peter 2021-02-26 16:21:26 +1100
Christine 2021-02-26 09:41:28 +1100
Chantelle 2021-02-26 04:17:01 +1100
Rosemary 2021-02-25 14:57:20 +1100