Australia must remain a nuclear-free country.
Nuclear energy and arms are not compatible with a clean future.
The Coalition's nuclear energy plan is light on detail but heavy with danger. It's a costly distraction from effective climate action that risks delaying – and even derailing – the sensible, considered and speedy transition to renewables that is already well underway and essential to protect the environment and safeguard our future.
To our representatives, we call on you to make Australia nuclear-free:
- End uranium mining and exports, and clean up all old uranium mines;
- Say no to nuclear power – it is high-risk, high-cost and a dangerous distraction from real climate solutions, like clean energy from the sun and wind;
- Take a strong stand against nuclear weapons – this includes signing and ratifying the UN nuclear weapons ban treaty;
- Manage radioactive waste transparently and responsibly.
The exaggerated claims being made by the latest round of nuclear promoters do not alter the evidence which clearly shows nuclear is the worst option for Australia. Promoting nuclear today will keep coal and gas burning for decades to come!
There are many reasons nuclear energy is not a viable alternative for Australia’s energy future:
-
It takes too long – on average, it takes about nine years to build a nuclear power station and another 10 years for planning and licensing. Effectively that means two decades between first idea and first power. These are the critical decades to immediately reduce our reliance on fossil fuels.
-
It’s dirty and dangerous – Nuclear power stations pose significant community, environment and health risks. Apart from the radioactive waste they generate, nuclear power stations run on uranium which, like coal and gas, is not a renewable resource.
-
It’s far more expensive than renewable options – Modelling shows developing nuclear infrastructure is 5-10 times more expensive than solar and wind. And even if the technology was in place, it would also cost more to produce.
-
It needs a lot of water – Nuclear reactors use tonnes of water per second to cool the reactors to produce electricity. This is unlike wind and solar which require little or no ongoing water use.
-
We have no proven options for managing long-term radioactive waste – All reactors create waste, and this is a growing and unresolved global management issue. For decades successive governments have tried to impose low and intermediate level waste dumps and stores, predominantly on First Nations lands, across multiple sites in Australia.
We must leave the uranium in the ground to keep our communities and the nature we rely on safe.
Let's get it right and make Australia nuclear-free.
Header image: Sea lions gather on the beach on the Eyre Peninsula. At the top of the Peninsula is Kimba, where the government is proposing to put a national radioactive waste site despite unanimous opposition from Barngarla Traditional Owners
Latest Supporters
Radioactive waste lasts a long time and there is no safe, easy way to deal with it. Chernobyl shows too many risks too, especially with the effects of climate change as an unknown into the future. We need investment in renewables now.
Nuclear power requires a lot of water for cooling. Australia has a history of drought. 10 year drought. Nuclear power has waste which will be buried in our deserts. Our deserts sit on top of underground waterways and the nuclear waste will seep into these waterways poisoning everything from the desert to the sea. Nuclear power is not suited to Australia’s environment. It is not rocket science anybody with an ounce of intelligence can see that nuclear power is not a good choice for Australia.
Too dangerous, too slow in construction and unnecessary if we keep supporting and growing renewable alternatives
If not clean it leaves Radioactive waste for thousands of years.
Australia has plenty of options for green power generation (solar, tidal, hydro and wind). Why give ourselves a potential problem for the future.
Nuclear is not the answer. Takes so much longer than is being asserted to build and without consultation in the areas proposed lots of problems ahead. The LNP are happily unelectable with this and other policies.
Use solar Australia has no shortages of sun
Nuclear madness: building ultimately deadly and hideously expensive reactors will not ease the cost of living ‘crisis’. The whole idea is (at best) a stunt. And pity help us if the idiots agree to store nuclear waste here.
As Nuclear is not the way to go!!
Have we learned nothing from Chernobyl? The health safety and future depends on our ability to make evidence based sensible and safe decisions . The evidence is clearly toxic deadly and an environmental disaster.
Dumbest idea ever. Dutton is a fool.
I remember what happened in Chernobyl. Not a lot of younger people remember or even know about it.
If they have a problem with the reactor it’s usually a human error.
Do people in favour of nuclear energy really want the same thing to happen here in Australia?
I don’t think so.
Mr Dutton is very mis-informed if he thinks it cheaper and better for the environment.
Who pay to remove the waste and
Australian Deserve to have basic health needs met for for a healthy life style, not for profit for the corporations who only think about profits margins!
I would like to know how the nuclear waste can be stored safely well into the future. Is it at all possible?
It’s a ridiculous concept for Australia!